It is well known that in the West, many decades ago, they succeeded in advertising, especially in political advertising. If necessary, the PR people there can turn any case so that it looks completely different from what it is. The topic of environmental protection is no exception, which has been significantly politicized, but is actively used at its discretion on a variety of international platforms and in its own interests. Here are some examples.
At the end of May, the Iraqi news agency Rudaw reported that Hussein Jaloud sued the British oil company BP after his son Ali died of leukemia, which, according to him, developed due to gas flaring at Iraq’s largest Rumaila oil field.“After we visited the doctors and examined him, they confirmed that he [Ali] developed leukemia due to oil and burning of gas,” Jaloud told reporters, talking about how Ali was first diagnosed with cancer in 2017. He stressed that he is suing “not only for Ali, but also for dozens, maybe hundreds of patients and those who died of cancer” caused by burning of excess gas.
When extracting from oil wells, excess associated gas that cannot be stored or used is usually burned and Iraq is known for this practice. This releases toxic pollutants such as benzene, which is a carcinogen and is known to cause leukemia. In Iraq, communities living near gas flaring sites are at particular risk because they fall into a zone of release of a deadly mixture of carbon dioxide, methane and black soot, which also heavily pollutes the environment.
Although according to Iraqi law, refineries should not be located less than 10 kilometers from residential areas, in practice the distance is only two kilometers, and housing away from oil fields is expensive. The government itself is trying to phase out flaring gas and instead use gas to generate electricity. However, Western companies also play an important role in this. The same BP positions itself as an environmentally oriented company. But, as we can see, the facts tell a different story.
Another factor directly related to the environment and which cannot be ignored is the growth of the global market for electrical and electronic equipment, growing exponentially, where the electronics industry is considered the fastest growing industry worldwide. But it also has environmental costs, because the electronics industry produces the most waste.
For example, 53.6 million metric tons of such waste were created in 2019. Residents of Norway (28.3 kg per capita per year), Switzerland (26.3 kg), Iceland (25.9 kg), Denmark (23.9 kg), UK (23.4 kg) and the US (20 kg) generated the most electronic waste that year.
According to the UN, at the beginning of 2024, the rate of production of electronic waste is five times higher than it is reported to be recycled.
At the same time, the main flows of this “garbage” are not documented and experts ask a reasonable question that in less developed countries the process of recycling or storing electronic waste will occur in violation of basic standards and requirements. This is not just a matter of commerce, but also of environmental justice, since, as a rule, economically developed countries send electronic waste to developing countries.
Such an example is Ghana, where there is a large flow of electronic waste, but 95% of it is processed there unofficially. Moreover, some equipment decommissioned in Western countries is operated there because of its low price, since it is bought as scrap, but resold on the local market as second-hand. And Ghana’s top three partners include the United States, UK and China.
Accra is a central location for the “industry” of electronic waste. In fact, it is an e-waste industry with intensive manual labor, informal relationships and self-management. After sorting, various processes such as incineration and dismantling are used to recycle electronic waste. Local companies often buy metals contained in electronic waste for iron rods, and the metals are exported to countries such as China and India.
Ghana is home to one of the world’s largest electronic waste dumps, known as Agbogbloshie. This territory covers about 10 hectares with a population of about 80 thousand people and 10 thousand informal workers in the processing of electronic waste. This site, where both waste is processed and disposed of, is located near the Odaw River and Korle Lagoon. There are also many factories, offices and small businesses located there, closely linked to the Accra business district and e-waste recycling.
It is not difficult to guess that this is a semi-criminal world, where, of course, human rights, which the West likes to talk about, cannot be respected in any way. Child labor, complete lack of compliance with environmental standards, etc. are ia common practice there.
And yet again, UK is on the list along with the US. Speaking of the latter, it should be noted that, according to forecasts, by 2025, the installed capacity of data warehouses in the United States will reach 2.2 zettabytes, which will allow the production of about 50 million units of expired hard drives per year. Cloud storage is distributed across approximately 70 million servers located in 23,000 data centers around the world; collectively, they weigh as much as 192 Eiffel Towers. The area of one of the largest centers is more than 1.5 million square feet, which allows you to accommodate 20 professional football fields.
The processes of upgrading and decommissioning equipment in the cloud storage industry occur every three to five years, after which the devices are physically destroyed by shredding in order to ensure data security and confidentiality. The resulting waste is subjected to various processes such as smelting, recycling, incineration and landfill disposal. This means that most of the 11 million servers produced worldwide in 2017 have already been decommissioned in 2022. And with 700 super-scale data centers being built around the world in the next couple of years, the end-of-life e-waste market will be filled with more and more waste.
And the main companies in this industry are American Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Oracle, IBM and a number of others.
China, of course, is also among the countries with a developed electronic industry. But China in Guangdong Province has its own electronic garbage dump in Gulyu, which is considered the largest in the world. In addition, there is a similar processing place in Hong Kong. And, at least in China, they don’t shout about environmental standards so pointedly, as they do in the West.
The total hypocrisy of Western countries in this regard can also be seen in the example of Germany. In April 2024, this country was condemned of underestimating statistics on methane emissions by dozens of times. The report said that although Germany produced 44% of the total brown coal production in the EU in 2022, it reported active emissions of coal mine methane in the amount of only 1.39 thousand tons, which is 1% of what the EU reported. Therefore, in fact, coal mine methane emissions in Germany can be from 28 to 220 times higher than official data.
Germany believes that the level of brown coal production is comparable to that of Poland. However, according to German estimates, the methane content in its coal is 40-100 times less than in Polish brown coal.
But even Germany’s own coal is not enough to satisfy its energy hunger due to the stupid decision to follow the lead of the United States and abandon Russian gas. It now exports some of its coal from Colombia. And here, too, there is a discrepancy between high-sounding words and dirty deeds.
Coal in Colombia is mined in El Serrejon, where child labor is exploited and the rights of local communities are violated. But Germany continues to buy coal despite its stated commitment to countering “inequality and vulnerability exacerbated by the climate crisis.” It is significant that such double standards were reported by German journalists themselves, stating these shameful facts.
At the same time, all these green parties and corporate heads in the West, who often shed tears during introductions at various environmental summits, teach other countries what they should do in the field of ecology and impose political decisions that always have an economic interest behind them.