It means it wasn’t Russia, and it’s too dangerous for the German government to call out the perpetrator (the US). Democracy in the West…
On Friday, Germany’s interior ministry said that the German Federal Police had completed their part of the investigation and turned in their findings. However:
Sahra Wagenknecht: Government refuses information on pipeline attacks.
The member of the Bundestag had asked the responsible ministries for information before and after the explosions – in vain, writes Berliner Zeitung
Sahra Wagenknecht, opposition politician in the German parliament, asked the German government for information on the attack on the Northstream pipelines, and got this reply:
«”For reasons of the state’s well-being” no further information will be provided.
“After careful consideration, the federal Government has come to the conclusion that further information cannot be provided – not even in classified form – for reasons of the state’s well-being.” The reason for this is the “third-party rule” for international cooperation of the intelligence services. According to this, the international exchange of knowledge is subject to particularly strict secrecy requirements.
“The information requested thus affects confidentiality interests that are so in need of protection that the state’s well-being outweighs the parliamentary right to information and the right of members of Parliament to ask questions must exceptionally take precedence over the confidentiality interest of the federal government.“ In plain language: there are probably findings that the members of the Bundestag are not allowed to learn.
For this reason, the German government does not answer Wagenknecht’s question “which NATO ships and troops” have been in the areas where the damage occurred since the suspension of gas supplies by Nord Stream 1, and which Russian ships and troops were sighted during that period.
This answer, too, “would involve the disclosure of information that would have a particular impact on the welfare of the state,” writes the Federal Foreign Office. Therefore, a classification and deposit of the requested information is also out of the question, “since even the low risk of becoming known cannot be accepted”.», Berliner Zeitung writes.
According to Mats Ljungqvist, the Swedish prosecutor involved in the country’s criminal investigation of the leaks in the Swedish economic zone, the country will not join a Eurojust Joint Investigation Team, which would require them to share their findings with Germany and Denmark.
Eurojust – an EU agency which coordinates judicial co-operation in criminal matters among member state agencies – said the Joint Investigation Team is “one of the most advanced tools used in international cooperation in criminal matters, comprising a legal agreement between competent authorities of two or more States for the purpose of carrying out criminal investigations.”
Sweden’s concerns over joining the team – which typically take 12-24 months to investigate – is “directly linked to national security,” according to Ljungqvist in a statement to Reuters.
Ljungqvist’s remarks come after German news website Der Spiegel reported a similar situation, citing unnamed German security sources. It said that Sweden had rejected the idea of sharing information it uncovered from its probe into the Nord Stream leaks with Germany and Denmark, saying that “the confidentiality level of the results of its investigation was too high to share them with other states.”
Ljungqvist noted that outside of the proposed formal investigation team, Sweden had otherwise been cooperating with Denmark and Germany in investigating the Nord Stream leak. –The Epoch Times
Days earlier, Sweden said they weren’t willing to share information with Russia regarding their investigation.
“In Sweden there is secrecy around preliminary investigation and that also applies in this case,” said outgoing PM Magdalena Andersson in an Oct. 11 statement to AP.
Swedish Security Services spokesperson said they are working with ‘other authorities,’ including internationally, as part of their own investigation.
Four Leaks
A total of four leaks were detected on the Nord Stream pipelines—two on Nord Stream 1 and two on Nord Stream 2—in late September, sparking widespread suspicions and concerns, including by NATO, of sabotage. While both Nord Stream pipelines, which travel through the Baltic Sea from Russia to Germany, were not in operation, both were filled with gas that leaked to the surface of the water. Nord Stream 1 had recently stopped supplying gas and Nord Stream 2 never began operating.
The fourth leak, off southern Sweden, was reported by the Swedish coast guard on Sept. 29. The earlier three leaks were reported on Sept. 26. Nord Stream AG, the operator of the network, issued a statement that flagged the close timing of the three leaks. It told reporters: “The destruction that occurred on the same day simultaneously on three strings of the offshore gas pipelines of the Nord Stream system is unprecedented.”
Prior to reports about the three leaks, explosions were recorded along the Nord Stream pipelines. A first explosion was recorded by seismologists early Monday southeast of the Danish island of Bornholm. A second, stronger blast northeast of the island that night was equivalent to a magnitude-2.3 earthquake. Seismic stations in Denmark, Norway, and Finland also registered the explosions.
Chief of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service told the Russian TASS news agency on Friday that they have intelligence data on sabotage at the two pipelines, but did not elaborate.
Nord Stream 1 had been the main source of Russian gas to Europe until late Aug. 19, when Russian state-owned oil and gas firm Gazprom shut off the gas for maintenance. In early September, Gazprom announced it had abandoned plans to restart gas flows through the pipeline to Germany indefinitely, saying that an oil leak in a critical turbine was not yet fixed. Russia has blamed international sanctions over the war in Ukraine for deterring the pipeline’s routine maintenance.
Meanwhile, Nord Stream 2 never came into operation. Germany in February halted the certification of the gas pipeline shortly prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. At the time, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said the refusal to certify the pipeline was in response to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s recognition of the independence of two Russian-backed breakaway regions in eastern Ukraine.