It’s often been said, during and in the aftermath of the Iraq War, that it was the single greatest foreign policy failure/fiasco in US history. Was it?
Of course, given the passions surrounding the event then spiraling out of control, many agreed with the assessment(especially given the incompetence of George W. Bush), but in retrospect, the Iraq War pales in comparison with, say, the Vietnam War and its impact on American society. It’s unlikely that future historians and social critics will obsess over Bush’s misadventure as people have done so about the role of the Vietnam War in American politics and culture. Indeed, prior to the raging controversy over the Iraq War, many had pointed to ‘Vietnam’ as the biggest foreign policy mistake in US history.
But, even that assessment may have been overblown, partly because of the trauma of America’s first ‘defeat’. Arguably, the victories in previous wars obscured their longer-term dire effects. The US was on the winning side in World War I and World War II, but its key role in the defeat of Germany in the First World War led to disastrous results, paving the way for World War II.
To be sure, World War II, like any great historical event, wasn’t an inevitability, but the preconditions created by the peace forced on Germany by the US and its partners escalated tensions in Central Europe that made another war more likely. Such considerations have been obfuscated by the official narratives that conveniently placed all the blame on Hitler and Germany.
There’s also the view that Hitler was SO EVIL that it was indeed a moral imperative for the UK and US to have goaded him into war so as to bring down his villainy, i.e. even if Hitler was provoked, it was justified in order to bring him down by whatever means necessary.
There’s also the uniquely American view that the war was a welcome boost that finally ended the Great Depression. Besides, the Good Guys won the Good War against the Most Evil Regime in History. And the Americanists regarded the post-war order as one in which the freedom-loving US defended liberty and spread prosperity around the world, especially against the communist threat.
But, such a narrative is rather too convenient for Americans whose domain was untouched by direct conflict, notwithstanding the attack on Pearl Harbor. If American policies had made the war more likely, they were partly responsible for the tens of millions of deaths across Europe.
Also, had the war been avoided, most Eastern Europe nations would have allied with Germany against the Soviet Union, thereby limiting the extent of communist influence. The so-called Cold War could have been avoided with Germany and its partners as bulwark against communist Russia.
Also, had the war been avoided, there would have been no Holocaust, which means no paralyzing narrative to guilt-bait-and-burden the entire West as either genocidal mass killers, collaborators, or do-nothings in regard to the ‘greatest crime of all time’. Thus, abuses of Jewish Power could have been countered and checked more effectively, preventing the rise of the conditions that currently infest the West with the pathology of Jew Worship. What kind of civilized and sane order would hand the keys to the kingdom the likes of Victoria Nuland and her ilk?
Also, without the complete collapse of Europe as a viable power center, the tragic consequence of World War II, the second half of the 20th century would have been more balanced and multipolar in its power equation. The US and USSR as great powers would have had to contend with the great power(s) of Continental Europe and of course the British.
World War II effectively divided Europe into two camps, vassals of the US and the vassals of the USSR. Minus an autonomous Europe with the will and power to fend off both American and Russian hegemonism, world history turned into a cartoon of ‘democracy vs totalitarianism’, ‘imperialism vs revolution’, ‘free world vs tyranny’, ‘capitalism vs communism’, ‘individualism vs collectivism’, and etc. as if the ONLY historical/ideological choices were Americanism and Sovietism. There was, to be sure, the Non-Aligned Movement, but its anxious existence implied that the two towering giants were the US and USSR, with most the world compelled to be on the side of one or the other.
The American role in the creation of Israel should be recognized as another contender for the biggest foreign policy disaster. Given the lack of direct US military involvement, its dramatic success as nation-building(as Palestinians were quickly neutralized), and the Jewish grip on academia/media, it’s no surprise that few people dare to name the American role in Zionism as a foreign policy disaster, let alone the biggest ever.
Yet, so much of what has gone wrong in American foreign policy(and domestic affairs as well) could be traced to that event. Increasingly, the ‘Arabists’ were purged from the US government, leading to an imbalance in America’s formulation and application of policy throughout the Middle East and North Africa. Even though the US support for Zionism initially concerned only the lands of Palestine, as Jews grew in power and ambition it went from a national project to an imperial overreach, getting the US into one hell of a mess in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Lebanon, and Iran. America’s increasingly one-sided support for Israel has embittered and inflamed much of the Arab/Muslim world. And now with the ‘Gaza Genocide’, America’s reputation around the world is in the toilet.
Furthermore, the tragicomic spectacle of all those brown-nosing white goy politicians and pundits shilling for Jewish Supremacism has done irreparable harm to the global perception of white folks. No longer seen as members of a proud, confident, and free race, they’re seen as servile, craven, and venal. White Republican idea of success is winning Jews over by indulging the Tribe’s absolute worst instincts. “If we support them in genocide, maybe just maybe they’ll kick us less and toss us more shekels.” How morally bankrupt is American Conservatism?
Now, it’s possible that white goyim would have turned into cuck-maggots of Jewish Power regardless of Israel’s existence. Even without the fruition of the Zionist project, Jews would likely have amassed great power and influence in the US with their talent, drive, cunning, and networking. One could argue that the Holocaust Narrative, more than Zionism, became the main albatross(or gooney bird) around the white goy’s neck.
To a degree, Zionism has tainted the Jews with accusations of ‘racism’, imperialism, colonization, supremacism, and ‘Nazi-like’ behavior, especially with Netanyahu’s Israel gone full armageddon on the ‘Amalek’. Even without Israel’s creation, one could argue that the Shoah Business alone would have been sufficient to morally check the white race into cuckdom.
That said, the Zionist narrative, especially in the US, has been instrumental to Jewish Power for several reasons. As Jewish-dominated media shaped the narrative, the general perception was of Israel as the plucky underdog, the only homeland for the Jews(and the ‘only democracy in the Middle East’, as well as ‘safe haven’ for Sodomites), surrounded by barbaric Arabs/Muslims with Nazi-like genocidal intentions. Prior to the role of social media(and shrewd Arab-American inroads into the influential Middle East Studies departments across the academia), most Americans bought into the Jewish narrative on Middle East affairs, especially during the Cold War when Israel was portrayed as America’s trusty(LOL) ally pitted against the clients of the Soviet Union.
Zionism also elevated the standing of Jews among the American Christian community, a key voting bloc among the Republicans, quite a feat considering that Christian conservatism long distrusted Jews for religious and/or ideological issues. For many white Christians of the Imperial persuasion, the idea of ‘white’ Jews (re)conquering the Holy Land from the darky Moslems was the next best thing to the Christian Crusades. At the very least, the West had once again wrested control of the sacred territories from the swarthy ‘sand niggers’.
Among the more zealous-minded within the Evangelical community, the Jewish return to the Holy Land was the first step in the fulfillment of the Prophecy. And among the more cuckish Christians(who idolize Jews as the superior master race of Chosenites), salvation was inconceivable without blessing the Jews to secure the blessing of God.
So, even though Israel was founded as a secular national-socialist state, American Christians found reasons to rhapsodize about the People of the Book, the Chosen, restored to their sacred homeland as precondition for the Second Coming. Given that the mindless Christian fealty to Israel has kept the masses of Evangelicals predisposed to favor Jews — even ‘liberal’ Jews are deemed as prodigal sons who, with enough adulation from the Christian community, shall return to the fold as God’s Chosen folks —, Zionism has been a net positive for Jewish Power.
If Israel didn’t exist, most Christian Conservatives might have regarded Jews as anti-religious, cosmopolitan, rootless, radical, subversive, and etc. The Christian fantasies of Israel keeps the Evangelicals hoping and praying for the day when Jews shall finally see the light, reject secular material liberalism, and lead all of humanity, especially the Christians, towards the promise of Salvation.
Of course, Christians don’t need Jews and Judaism to be ‘saved’ as the New Testament explicitly states that the original Covenant(between God and Jews) was rendered null and void so as to make way for the New Covenant between God and all those who would accept Jesus, the Son of God whose death was demanded by Jews.
But, given the rise of Holocaustianity as a rival cult and America’s obsession with winners, post-war Christianity found itself having to come to terms with the image of Jews as little-christs who were crucified(or gassified) for the sins of Gentile Europe and as neo-Caesars of money and power in the postwar era.
Even though most Jews are anti-white, anti-Christian, and/or anti-conservative, the fantasies about Israel has sustained the Christian dream of the ‘conversion of the Jews’(if not to Christianity itself than to a favorable attitude toward Christians).
Now, it’s all laughable upon close inspection. While it’s true that Democratic Jews despise white conservatives and Christians, it’s no less true that most so-called ‘conservative’ Jews loathe whites & Christians, maintaining a bogus one-sided alliance only to exploit the goyim as dogs and cattle in service to Jewish Power and Zion. When has the Jews in Israel ever reciprocated the affection(or delusion) of the Christ-cuck community? While these Christians believe they must bless Jews in order to be blessed by God, no Jew believes he must bless whites/Christians in order to be blessed by God(or be justified in the eyes of History). Jews believe they’re blessed by God regardless(even if they hate goyim), whereas white Christians believe they must bless Jews to earn God’s blessing. When the likes of Netanyahu spout nonsense like ‘our cause is your cause’, they mean ‘you must serve us’, not ‘we must serve each other’. It’s about white interests being nullified in total subordination to Jewish interests than about whites and Jews finding common grounds for mutual benefit. When Israel doesn’t want illegal African migrants, what does it do? It steers them to Europe. “We Jews don’t want these troublesome savages, but if you Europeans don’t take them off our hands, you’re ‘racist’!” Such is Jewish ‘moral’ logic.
The relative amnesia about the Iraq War(for all the negative hype during the crisis) may owe to several factors. The Vietnam War proved traumatic to the Liberal Elite not only for its divisiveness but for re-igniting the political career of Richard Nixon, whose comeback had been inconceivable earlier in the decade. Thus, the Democrats not only faced defeat abroad(to the ‘commies’) but lost at home to Tricky Dick, one of the most reviled figures in liberal and elite circles.
In contrast, the Iraq debacle led to the triumph of Obama as a kind of dream-deferred-finally-come-true. For a spell, the Democrats could believe he was The One, the spiritual fusion of JFK and MLK whose missions of peace and justice had been cut short. Foreign policy disaster led to the biggest Democratic success in the 21st century. Thus, the Iraq War, which could be blamed mostly on the GOP, had a far less depressive effect on the Liberal elites(who are now most of the elites) who write History.
But, another(and more significant) reason is that the Democratic or Neolib Jews (not so)quietly continued with the Neocon policies of the Dubya era. If the US retreat from Vietnam genuinely signaled an acceptance of new realities — former Indochina firmly in the communist sphere — , the chaos of Iraq hardly dented the overall policy trajectory premised on Jewish supremacy and Zionist hegemony. Besides, if the blame for the Vietnam War could be laid squarely at the feet of the red-baiting, paranoid, and ‘rightwing’ Anglo-American Establishment(still the ruling elites in the Sixties and Seventies), with Jews taking credit as the conscientious voices for peace, there was no getting around the fact that Iraq War was largely a Jewish concoction, even though the Jewish media never tired of reiterating the Gentile character of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and etc.
In truth, GOP goyim went all in with the Neocon policy in the hope of winning more Jews to their side. When the Bush project failed, the Neocons(at least the Jewish ones) weren’t permanently disgraced and dislodged but resuscitated via connections with the Neolib Zionists in the Democratic Party; thus, the agenda of destabilizing the region in service to Israel and World Jewry carried on despite Obama having gained the presidency on the promise of rolling back the policies of the Bush regime.
It wasn’t long before the War ON Terror became the War WITH Terror, as the Neolib Jews well understood that Jihadis made the most effective fighters against the regimes in Syria, Libya, and Iraq. Because the Zionist-led Democrats more or less continued with and even intensified the agenda of George W. Bush years, the disastrous aspects of the Iraq War were mostly memory-holed than held up as reminders(as the Vietnam War had been so often for so long as a dark lesson on the hubris of US foreign policy).
If anything, the Jewish Supremacist agenda only intensified and metastasized to Ukraine as well under Obama, the puppet monkey of the Jews. And the fact that Donald Trump, who campaigned on friendlier relations with Russia, spent his four years arming Ukraine to the teeth only demonstrated the primacy of the Jewish Supremacist agenda, i.e. whoever won the election had to do the bidding of the Jews, even if it entailed arming sub-Nazi types in Ukraine to lob missiles into the Donbass and slaughter Russian civilians.
It’s no wonder that the Iraq Debacle narrative was quietly sidelined as a possible hindrance to the continuance of the Jewish Supremacist agenda, expanding even to Ukraine, to find and destroy ‘new hitlers’(like Assad the ‘butcher of Syria’ or Putin the ‘hot-blooded Slav’) or to spread and defend ‘democracy’, because, of course, there are no finer icons of liberty and human rights than the Ukro-puppets shoe-horned into power following the CIA-backed Maidan coup. (Also, it’s no wonder that Jews now downplay the once pervasive narratives about McCarthyite paranoia and the threat of nuclear war. Jewish Power now fulminates against Russia-Russia-Russia everywhere and accuses anyone of being a Putin-puppet if not sufficiently antipathetic to Russia. Jewish supremacist pathology is such that it even entertains the possibility of nuclear war, indeed as if the Tribe could emerge relatively unscathed to scoop up all of Russia’s assets and resources from the ashes. Jews, who once used to mock hawkish figures like General Jack D. Ripper of DR. STRANGELOVE, now elevate the voices that reliably saber-rattle against Russia, even positing the possibility of victory by first strike.)
Some disasters are loud, others are silent. The latter may prove to be worse, but the former obviously gets more attention. Surely, the Iraq War was a lot louder than Harry Truman’s decision in the aftermath of World War II to aid and abet in the creation of Israel at the expense of the Palestinians. Consider the difference between someone cliff-diving & breaking his legs and someone choosing to become a habitual smoker. The cliff-diving accident is surely more dramatic in its immediate consequence, but tobacco may do greater harm in the long run, causing diseases of the heart, lungs, and other organs. Once the bones mend, one may be restored to full health, whereas diseases brought on by tobacco may well be fatal.
In that light, even though America’s role in the creation of Israel was muted in comparison to the brazen rampages in the Middle East, it sowed the poison seeds that sprouted into something like the monster plant in LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS. Indeed, nearly all the US wars in the Middle East could be traced back to Truman’s momentous decision to greenlight the Zionists. If Israel never existed(or was created in a manner tolerable to the Palestinians and Arabs), would US-Arab relations soured to the point of driving several key Arab states to the Soviet sphere of influence? (It’s no wonder that Jewish Power adopted the Neocon position in the Cold War as Zionist ambitions in the Middle East were checked as long as the USSR, as the other superpower, provided arms and advisors to the ‘hostile’ Arab/Muslim states. The total implosion of Soviet-Russia as a global player provided roughly a three-decade window of opportunity for the Zionist-led US to do as it pleased in the region, finally thwarted by Russia’s resurgence and entry into the Syrian conflict.)
If not for the politics prioritizing Zionist interests, would the US have come to regard certain states in MENA(Middle East and North Africa) as ‘enemies’? For all the outrage about ‘blood for oil’ during the Iraq Invasion, that conflict(and subsequent ones) were really about ‘blood for blood’, or spilling tons of Arab and/or Muslim blood(and the blood of US goy soldiers as well) to satiate the blood-lust of Zionism premised on the conviction that Jewish blood is sacred, exceptional & indispensable, whereas goy blood, that of whites included, is just commodity to be bought, sold, and disposed of.
It was worth it not only to kill half a million Arab children(as Madeleine Albright opined) but to send white/black/brown goy soldiers to kill and die for Jewish racial-spiritual right of domination. Why risk a drop of precious Jewish bodily fluids when seemingly limitless barrels of goy blood are there to be extracted and devoured by the war machine?
A similar logic is at play in Ukraine where World Jewry cackles with hideous glee at the sight of Slavs killing Slavs(as well as the numbnut goy mercenaries from around the world). But then, Jewish Supremacists are never in short supply of shabbos goy dogs willing to spew hawkish obscenities, like dogs barking for their master. The likes of Mike Pompeo, Lindsey Graham, Sebastian Gorka, and innumerable chickenhawks among the Democrats have publicly exulted in the reports of dead Russians on the battlefield. And for all their flowery rhetoric about defending ‘democracy’ and the national integrity of Ukraine, they seem giddy at the prospect of Jewish oligarchs grabbing all the spoils of war from the graveyards of Ukrainian soldiers. Like a dog’s biggest joy is the approval of its master, shabbos goyim know no greater happiness than praises from their Jewish overlords. As Nancy Pelosi once said, even if Congress burns to the ground, she and her shabbos goy whores will always be there for Jews and Israel.
Of course, in their cleverer moments, the shabbos goyim believe that, having adopted Jewish prejudices as their own, they are spared and favored by Jewish Power. Of course, even as those comprador-elites are rewarded individually, the racial and ethnic groups they belong to are no less targeted for destruction and humiliation by the Jews than the Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians, Iranians, and Russians are.
At any rate, it’s win-win for the Jews to have shabbos goyim as their attack dogs. The growling shabbos dogs do the bidding of their Jewish masters who, however, keep their composure and present themselves as fair-minded. How often have Jews blamed the problem between Jews and Palestinian/Arabs on the fanaticism of Christian Zionists and the Military-Industrial Complex? So, even though Jews have unleashed the Christian Zionist dogs-of-hell and the saber-rattlers in the Pentagon to bark up a storm, they present themselves as ‘secular liberals’ seeking the middle-ground. Playing good cop/bad cop.
Given that nearly all post-Cold War foreign policy fiascos can be traced back to the Neocon investment in the Zionist agenda(and related Jewish supremacist ventures), the American role in the creation of Israel could be deemed as the biggest foreign policy mistake in American History.
Some people, especially conservatives, may argue otherwise, i.e. Jews would have been even more ‘liberal’, ‘leftist’, or ‘radical’ had it not been for Israel as a magnet for right-leaning Jews for reasons that are religious(traditionalist), ideological(ethno-nationalist), and/or strategic(in need of alliances with conservative goy elements). After all, Jewish support for the GOP is incumbent on its cucking even harder for Israel than the Democratic Party does.
Being less aligned with the dominant Jewish(and ‘liberal’) Agenda for America, the Republicans fear Jewish wrath and proffer compensation by way of total support for Israel, especially as the Israeli far-right has been ascendant over the years — even Israel’s version of ‘liberalism’ is hard right by current Western standards. If Jews are holy or special and if all whites must secure their blessing one way or the other but if Jews shower most of their blessing on ultra-deracinated ‘liberal’ whites, doesn’t the Republican and Evangelical going-the-extra-mile in the cucking to Israel manage to scrape together some crumbs of blessing for the ‘conservative’ side? Of course, given the levels of Democratic Party’s appeasement of Jewish Power, this is no easy feat. The ‘conservative’ argument goes like this: If Democrats send weapons to Israel to kill 19,999 people, Republicans condemn it as ‘Anti-Semitic’ for the missing bullet that would have made for the round number of 20,000.
At any rate, the pro-Zionist argument among conservatives rests on the fallacy that rightist elements across the spectrum have shared visions and interests. This may be true at the structural level — all rightwing movements lean towards tribalism, ethnocentrism, traditionalism, and/or hierarchy — but hardly at the political level. For example, the hard right in Turkey and the hard right in Greece are likely to be more antagonistic to one another on the issue of Cyprus(and various other contentious issues). While all right-wing movements are anti-leftist, they are also likely to be at odds with other right-wing movements if their tribal, ethnic, or national interests clash. Good luck with hard right Hindus seeing eye to eye with hard right Islamists. Both Likud and Hamas could be deemed right-wing in their tribal politics, but they are fighting over the same territory.
Likewise, it’s a fool’s errand to hope that, because some Jews are rightist or conservative, their rightism or conservatism necessarily shares common ground with the rightism or conservatism of a goy group. For sure, the right in Japan and the right in the US during World War II felt nothing but hatred for one another.
At the religious level, Jews see themselves as the Chosen of God and see goyim as either lesser humans(at best) and subhuman cattle(at worst), whereas the rightwing version of Christianity upholds the idea of Jews as Christ-killers whose redemption and salvation are possible only through conversion to the True Faith, Christianity, the religion most loathed by Jews.
While Jewish rightists/conservatives may dislike and distrust the universalist Left, they may fear and loathe even more the goy right that insists on putting its own tribe, nation, culture, and/or race first and foremost, possibly to the detriment of the Jews(who are unsatisfied with mere co-existence and seek domination and control of the goyim as lesser inferior beings).
After all, so-called ‘antisemitism’ was more pronounced among the rightist elements throughout European history. And notwithstanding the certain leftist aspects of National Socialism, the main impetus for its Jew-hatred was essentially right-wing, i.e. the idea that Jews had to be dealt with as radical and subversive agents against the organic unity of the goy order.
At the very least, a universalist order, even if opposed to religion(or rival religions), doesn’t deny the basic humanity of all groups and even champions the equality of rights and protections under its preferred concept of justice, whereas a particularist order(of the right) may treat foreign elements as the eternal-other, unworthy of respect and dignity. For example, communism may have rejected Jews as Jews(in the religious or ethnocentric sense) but it accepted Jews as humans, as comrades, were they to adopt Marxism. In contrast, National Socialism rejected and targeted Jews as a race. It was an assault on the very being of Jewishness than on what Jews believed.
Given the nature of particularism and universalism, the former works well within a more or less homogeneous national setting, whereas the latter is more tolerable as an imperial project. Universalists may be fanatical and ruthless as they wipe out your people’s culture, myths, heritage, and customs but they will accept you as fellow brethren or comrades if you subscribe to their credo.
Anyway, the so-called alliance of Jewish rightism and white rightism in the US has been a dud, at least for goyim who didn’t even get the short end of the stick, which fell entirely into Jewish hands. Rightwing Jews narrowly define their ‘conservative’ interests in tribal terms(as one would expect from a people rooted in an ethno-religion), whereas rightwing whites broadly define conservatism in abstract and principled terms. Jewish rightism is ‘centric’, meaning Jews are at the center of the universe and all other groups must revolve around them. Goy conservatism and the Christian Right, in contrast, are mutualist, which means all groups must adhere to a set of shared principles. Jewish rightism is unyielding by nature, whereas the goy right seeks common ground, a mutualist compromise. (Given that the goy right usually caves to Jewish demands, Jews not only get what they want but the goy right looks foolish in its betrayal of mutualism. If indeed motivated by principles, why does it favor Jews uber alles? Is the goy right really about principles or about principals, i.e. Jews deserve special privileges as the principal race that demonstrated superiority via intelligence, will-power, and wealth-accumulation?)
Naturally, Jews encourage a deracinated form of conservatism among whites while upholding a rooted form of identity for themselves. Despite the alliance, Jews regard all goyim as enemies or potential enemies and therefore urge on their dissolution while guiding fellows toward concentration.
Granted, the rates of Jewish intermarriage with goyim are considerable, but oddly enough, this may strengthen than weaken Jewish tribalism. Why? Jews in elite circles tend to meet and mate with the best of goyim. Contrary to the caricature of the nebbish Jewish guy marrying some blonde buxom bimbo and having less intelligent kids, many Jews marry goyim with comparable IQ levels. Furthermore, as Jewishness has a certain aura while goy identities grow weak in the West, goyim who marry Jews tend to ‘convert’ to Jewishness(if not religious Judaism) and raise their children as Jews. Thus, a new form of Jewishness along HBD lines is coming into being. Not the kind based purely on blood but on the degrees to which Jewishness absorbs the best qualities of the goyim into a neo-Jewishness. Then, contrary to intermarriage making Jews dumber, it may make Jews smarter whereas the Jews who insist only on intra-group marriage may be left behind as they’d rather choose a less intelligent Jew over a highly intelligent goy.
Mere mention of figures like Ben Shapiro and Alan Dershowitz should suffice to disabuse anyone of the illusion of Jewish-White alliance in the supposedly ‘conservative’ sphere. Jews feel complete, wholly justified and worthy, without any sense of obligation to whites and Christianity, whereas white conservatives have been led to believe they’re devoid of meaning and purpose unless they’re an asset to the Jews. Jews feel no compunction to support nationalist Hungary or traditionalist Russia, but conservatives and nationalists, even Viktor Orban and Vladimir Putin, feel obliged to sing paeans to Jews and/or Israel. Consider the ludicrousness of Russia, mired in a horrible war in Ukraine(that was provoked by Jews) but having to pretend it is at war with Evil Nazis, the arch-enemies of Jews, when, in fact, those very sub-Nazi Ukrainians were activated by Jews to bring about the Slav-on-Slav bloodbath.
Had Israel not come into existence, would virtually all Jews have been Democrats? Could the GOP have developed into the Anti-Jewish party, if only by necessity, what with nearly all the Jews being opposed to it? The elections of 1916 and 1920 were the last ones in which the Republicans were competitive with the Jewish electorate — if Warren Harding won more Jewish votes than his Democratic rival in 1920, it was because a whopping 38% of Jews voted for the socialist Eugene Debs. Thereafter, the Jewish vote dramatically leaned to the Democrats, and Jewish remnants in the GOP may owe to the Israel factor, i.e. it’s beneficial for Jewish Power to keep at least one foot in the GOP camp lest the Republicans totally abandon the Jews.
The issue of Israel keeps many white conservatives clinging to the hope of Jewish awakening and political conversion to the Right. While the great majority of Jews are Democrats, a not insignificant percentage(usually 20%) reliably vote Republican. But the main motivation concerns not only Israel as a national project but, more problematically, Zionism as a neo-imperial grand strategy. Remember how William Kristol the prominent Neocon Republican bolted over to the Democrats the minute MAGA populism expressed weariness about more wars(for Zion). And consider how quickly Jewish ‘conservatives’ like Jennifer Rubin and David Brooks turned on a dime and sided with the Democrats. Scum Brooks voted for Obama twice, and Rubin’s involvement with ‘conservatism’ is to spill more goy blood, American and Arab/Muslim, for Zionist interests.
If virtually all Jews were Democrats in a world without Israel, would it have extinguished the last flicker of hope for the GOP to win them over? The GOP would have had no choice but to develop into an Anti-Jewish(or ‘Anti-Semitic’) party. With virtually zero chance with the Jews, American Conservatism might have been more clear-and-cold-eyed about ethnic politics and evaded the trap of Bill-Buckley-ism.
Could a persuasive Anti-Jewish argument be made in favor of Zionism as the ultimate catalyst for Jewish Power’s downfall, i.e. too much of a good thing can be a bad thing? Especially in the aftermath of the Six Day War, Jewish chutzpah grew ever more hubristic, as if nemesis could be forever forestalled with enough money, cunning, and cries of ‘antisemitism’. Just like a series of sudden successes inflated Hitler’s egotism into megalomania, global white submission to Zion has led to pathological levels of self-worship among Jews who now believe the world is their (g)oyster. But reckless abandon is usually a formula for self-destruction as hubris is met with nemesis. Israel has crushed Gaza but also damaged, perhaps irreparably, its global brand and reputation premised in large part on the Holocaust narrative of Jewish victimology. When the very people associated with Anne Frank behave like Heinrich Himmler, much of the moral capital has gone down the toilet. While Jewish chutzpah and hubris(or hubritzpah) have been around forever and likely been pervasive even minus the creation of Israel, Zionism did pull together the dispersed obsessions in a most concentrated form.
Perversely enough, supreme arrogance and panicked hysteria fueled one another as the most vain tend to be the most insecure. A common feature of Jewish Establishment punditry is the sheer rage over anyone(especially if goy) daring to oppose or naysay the Agenda. Just like the Biblical God fulminates with apocalyptic rage over the slightest hint of insubordination, Jewish Power goes into a hissy fit whenever met with pushback, made all the worse by pathetic white cuckery that turned Jewish supremacists into spoiled bratty children, albeit with all the power.
Thus, Jews are now the most intelligent but also the most infantile group in the world. For all their smarts, the emotions percolate at the level of childish tantrums to the song “I Want Candy” on endless replay. Jewish Power needs a good spanking, and hopefully, Israel’s excesses are finally turning the global ship around on the Jewish Question. Even prior to the Gaza horror, Jews had already alienated many peoples around the world, especially in Russia and Iran, long targeted by World Jewry. Still, because Jews channeled and ‘washed’ their power and influence through nominally goy-led countries like the US, UK, Canada, France, and the like, one could overlook or fail to notice the Jewish Factor in the events. For the casual observer, the whole anti-Russia campaign might come across as a case of ‘democracy’ vs ‘autocracy’, or the West vs the East.
However, because Israel was specifically created as a Jewish State, what happens there and is done in its name(by client states, of which the US is most important) comes with the unmistakable stamp of Jewishness. Israel vs Palestine might even serve as a metaphor for many observers, i.e. “We could be the next ‘Palestine’ if Jews decide to target us.”
Given the lopsided disparity between Jewish domination and Palestinian resistance, it was long known in activist circles that Israel has a serious human rights problem. But what Israel unleashed, militarily and rhetorically, following the Oct 7 Hamas attack has awakened the entire world to the true nature of the far-right ethno-supremacist regime in Tel Aviv, the bloody policies of which has the support of over 90% of Jewish Israelis.
Especially the idealistic and impressionable youth worldwide, with their savvy navigation through social media, couldn’t help but notice the the dark side of Zionism. And the blaring hypocrisy of the West, especially in elite circles, has been exposed to the world community.
The Gaza horror may yet collapse the Holocaust Narrative like a house of cards. Either Jews face accusation as the New Nazis or the Holocaust is called into question given the lies about Hamas atrocities that were quickly debunked due in no small part to social media, without which many might still believe in the hoaxes about forty beheaded babies and baby roasted in the oven.
While Israel may weather the storm(given its powerful backers), there are now growing fissures in the Zionist project. Ironically, Zionism may turn out to be the ultimate ‘Anti-Semitic’ dream, one that turned most of humanity against Jewish Power. It’s like the moment in CARLITO’S WAY when the Puerto Rican ex-gangster tells the Jewish lawyer Kleinfeld that they’re ‘even’(and enough is enough).
Even though the US elites are full of shabbos goyim, opinion polls among the younger generations(Jews included) don’t favor the Zionists. Donald Trump, though a veteran taker of Jewish dong up his bung, garnered significant support by channeling the populist backlash against more Wars for Israel. While Trump in his first term let Israel run loose within the territories it already occupies — Gaza, West Bank, and Golan Heights — , it was as if in de facto exchange for refusing to expand conflicts throughout the region. In other words, let Jews use bulldozers to raze Gaza, West Bank, and Golan Heights, but no tanks and bombers for more Wars for Zion. Thus, Trump managed to appease the short-sighted Jews in Israel who fixate on issues close to home but not so the far-sighted Jews with dreams of hegemony over the entirety of the Near East, not to mention the even more ambitious Jews whose agenda is global in scope, encompassing future domination over Russia and even China. In the Jewish Supremacist worldview, Jews as the Chosenites, the true master race, must take over(or reclaim) not only Palestine/Israel but what was formerly known as the (heavily Jewish)Pale of Settlement as the ramming rod against Russia with its vast resources. Jews control the West, the center of world power, but believe they must subjugate Russia as well to secure permanent hegemony. Russia remains a thorn on the Jewish side as long as it stands as an example, even model, of national sovereignty that can say NO to the Jewish Supremacist Agenda.
The Jewish dream is to turn Russians into clones of Anglo-cucks who venerate Jews as the rightful master race. Whereas the core meaning for Russians derives from their sense of independence, heritage, and pride, the core meaning for Anglos is bound up with their dog-like appeasement of and approval from Jews. Anglo-cucks have internalized and accepted their shameful status to such a degree that the mere sight of Russians rebuffing the Jewish Master Race agenda is deemed intolerable and offensive. It’s no wonder Anglo-cucks are all alike in the US, the UK, Canada, Australia, and etc. And needless to say, most of Western Europe follows this Anglo-Cuck model. The sheer hysterics of Anglo-cuckery, however, betrays something more than doglike servility. It could be a desperate attempt to repress their shame of servitude, like the Two Minutes Hate in George Orwell’s NINETEEN EIGHTY-FOUR where the minions of the state scream and holler at ‘Goldstein’ in an attempt at genuine passion despite having no choice in the matter; they must hate what they’re ordered to hate. Anglo-cucks uniformly howl and shriek at the image of Hot-Blooded Slav Putin, or Putler. Just like ‘Goldstein’ and his saboteurs are said to be the root cause of all the problems in Oceania, Putler and Putin-puppets are blamed for everything ‘wrong’ in the US and EU, like the election of Trump in 2016 and the ‘far right’ candidates in Europe, rather odd since Trump and ‘far right’ types in EU do little but suck up to Jews and Israel. As for China-China-China, the ‘Yellow Peril’ hysteria has been effective in distracting the masses from the fact of Jewish supremacy and domination.
Even as the West cucks to Jews, there’s the agenda of White Nakba whereby Jews use mass non-white immigration and anti-white indoctrination via media, academia, and statist policies to reduce whites to the status of current Palestinians in the Middle East. The West has been turned into one big West Bank.
But then, it may boomerang on the Jews. For all their successes, Jews may be digging their own grave. The retaliation may come from whites finally awakened to the hostile Jewish agenda or from nonwhites who either regard Jews as super-white-devils or the real architects of the West’s war on the Non-West. Or it may come from both whites and nonwhites, though white motives may differ across the political spectrum, with the White Right fueled by racial vengeance while the White Left joins with nonwhites against Jews as the new super-oppressors, as with white progressive unity with pro-Palestinian voices across the West.
Conquests can lead to two outcomes. Total subservience or simmering resentment that may blow up in the face of the conquerors. Germans and Japanese have been so completely beaten, conquered, and broken after World War II that they’ve consigned themselves to eternal cuckdom. This is also true of many whites, especially of Northern European stock. Jews conquered them so thoroughly in body and soul, rammed their collective ass so deeply in ethno-sodomy, that the Anglos, Germanics, and Scandies cannot conceive of any possibility other than serving Jews as their rightful masters.
But not all peoples have surrendered and submitted with such total abandon in history, and Jews themselves have been a prime example. Even when down on their luck and seemingly defeated for good, they never stopped resenting, hating, and conspiring against the goyim who had power over them. It was wiles behind the smiles as Jews were unwilling to ever let it go, forgive and forget, and bury the hatchet. It was never in the Jewish cultural DNA. But then, Jews are not alone in the culture of vendetta.
For every person who totally submits to the Jews, there’s another looking for the first opportunity to strike back. Jewish Power is now vulnerable, more so than at any time after World War II, because it has deeply offended the elements of the most dynamic left and the most dynamic right. The Left is appalled by the brazen racial supremacism of Jews in Israel and their global facilitators. And much of the Right, one that is honest, is now awake to the true nature of the Jewish strategy of White Demise. China, once a basket-case, is now an economic giant that is tired of being kicked around by Jews and their white cucks. It won’t name the Jewish Power but won’t submit to it either. Russia, which long desired good relations with the Jewish-controlled West but on its own terms of mutual respect, discovered in the Ukraine crisis that the ONLY acceptable deal for Jews is ‘their way or the highway’, i.e. Western enmity of ‘Russophobia’ will ebb ONLY IF Russians cuck to Jews like the pathetic brown-nosing Anglos. And the spoiled-rotten behavior of Israel backed by the US and EU has just about alienated too much of the Middle East for good. And with China, Russia, and Iran as rising powers, the fear of US bullying may gradually become a thing of the past. Jewish globalism has a strange way of building bridges by burning them.
And in a way, even white cuckery, especially from the Republicans/Conservatives, is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it’s a great support system for Jews, but on the other hand, it associates Jewish Power with the white race that the Jewish academia/media have been demonizing forever. If whites are ‘evil racists’ but if whites suck up to Jews the most, even a dummy may wonder, “Jews must be super-evil to win such love from the evil white racists.” It’s why Jews both demand and demean Republican and MAGA support. If Trump is indeed New Hitler, what does it say about the nature of Jewish power when he’s so chummy with the arch-Zionists?
Speaking of foreign policy disasters and national interests, one must weigh their long term consequences against their short term impact. What may seem disastrous in the short run may prove to be advantageous in the long run, if not for the instigators than for humanity as a whole. The notion of ‘national interest’ is far more complicated than one may assume. Is it defined by policy goals of the state or what is beneficial to the nation as a whole? Failure for the state may prove to be good for the nation. So often in the political discourse, matters of national interest are focused on the elites in Washington D.C. and power centers like New York. But, the US comprises fifty states and innumerable communities, and most Americans have gained nothing and lost a good deal from America’s ventures around the world that have less to do with national defense/security than with the power-and-profit-lust of neo-imperialism(with Jewish supremacists at the helm).
Aggressive foreign policy successes, in further emboldening the imperial state, may actually be worse for the national interest, whereas the failures, in bringing forth a more sober and cautious approach, may actually serve the national interest. In a sense, a series of foreign policy disasters may actually be regarded as positives in having de-legitimized the wasteful and often psychotic proponents of empire. The Iraq War was bad but might have been worse had it succeeded, as it might have justified further wars to remake the Middle East. Likewise, as disastrous as the US venture in Ukraine proved to be, imagine if it had been wildly successful and if Russia had been defeated. Jewish supremacists might have pushed for the Napoleonic/Hitlerian push into Russia itself, and then what?
Granted, the failure of the Iraq War didn’t prevent the Obama administration from pushing for more regime changes, leading to fresh horrors in Libya and Syria, all in the furtherance of Jewish Power. That said, despite all the deaths and destruction wrought by these wars, it may be that the Neocons/Neolibs inadvertently paved the way for a rearrangement and revitalization of the region to the advantage of the Arabs and Muslims. With Saddam Hussein gone, Iraq grew closer to Iran and served as a bridge between Iran and Syria. And then, the Jewish attempt to destroy Syria led to a stronger bond among Syria, Russia, and Iran. Jewish-led US policies in Ukraine and Taiwan certainly brought Russia and China closer together. In a way, though not by intention, Jewish global meddling has perversely been a positive force in reshaping the world. For all the harm done to humanity with their domineering and destructive policies, Jews have triggered responses in the world community toward an alternative system to the End of History model posited by Francis Fukuyama. It’s like a serial killer who turns his targeted victims into an alert community of vigilant defenders. People who might have never come together if left to their own devices bonding into a brotherhood against the would-be menace. Jews took up the hammer and chisel to destroy their perceived enemies but may end up sculpting an ‘Anti-Semitic’ masterpiece. In the long run, the Neocons may be remembered not only as warmongering destroyers but as unwitting creators of a whole new order. History is funny that way.
Other than its role in the creation of Israel and indulging the worst tendencies of Zionism, the contender for America’s biggest foreign policy disaster is most likely the entry into World War I. The folly of World War I has surely been more obvious to the British, to whom the impact was immediate and devastating. Niall Ferguson’s THE PITY OF WAR reflected on Britain’s involvement in the war as a death knell for the empire and catalyst for worse tragedies yet to unfold in Europe. As the result of British involvement, the war was prolonged, many more died, German defeat led to events that led to the rise of Hitler; and of course, the Bolshevik takeover was also a byproduct of the war, perhaps preventable had the war not been prolonged by the British.
Less obvious is the long-term negative impact of the American entry into the war. Even with Britain in the fight, American neutrality would have prevented the German collapse and defeat, likely leading to some kind of eventual truce between France/Britain and Germany. With a semi-victorious Germany at the center of Europe, the social and economic catastrophe of the Weimar years could have been avoided. Also, Germans would have retained much of the territory it gained from the Russian empire, thereby limiting the power of the Bolsheviks. And of course, radicals like Hitler wouldn’t have come to power to gamble away Germany’s future.
While the US, separated from Europe by a vast ocean, was less affected by Continental affairs than the UK, the long-term impact of the German defeat in World War I spread its poison weeds to the US as well. The Anglo and Anglo-American paranoia about Germany(and the German diaspora in general) precluded the potential for the most constructive partnership in the West, the Anglo-German one. Good relations between the US, the British Empire, and Germany as the leading Continental power could have been the basis of peace and prosperity.
But even more significantly, the vilification of Germany in World War I and the demonization of Germany during and especially after World War II had profound ideological, moral, and cultural reverberations across the West. Germany, especially under National Socialism, came to be conflated not only with thick-skulled Teutonism and Aryanism but ‘white supremacy’ in general.
Therefore, despite the crucial role of the UK and US, along with the USSR, in the defeat of Hitler, the damnation of Evil Germany later served as a model of shaming and guilt-baiting any and all expressions of white identity and interests. First, Germany was burdened with guilt, then all of Continental Europe for having collaborated with evil, been neutral, or been too weak/craven to put up much of a fight. While the UK was initially honored for its resolute Churchill-led opposition to Hitler, it wasn’t long before the British racial consciousness and attitudes were compared with Nazism, i.e. both were forms of ‘white supremacism’. And then, the US was blamed for not having done enough to stop the Holocaust, apparently by bombing railroads that took Jews to the camps. Worse, American racial problems, especially with blacks in the South, were conflated with Nazi policies.
Today, many whites, even in the South, believe the Confederate flag is just as toxic, offensive, and evil as the Nazi Swastika. Anglos and Anglo-Americans, by defeating and demonizing the Germans, thought their vaunted place in the world was permanent. And for a while following the war, it seemed the world was theirs, except that Jews eventually took over the commanding heights of American institutions and spun the Anti-German narrative in such a way as to accuse and blame Anglos as well, i.e. even if Anglos in the UK and US were instrumental in the defeat of Evil Nazi Germany, weren’t the racial attitudes of Anglos and Germans, the two most successful groups of the Northern European phenotype, two sides of the same coin?
With the widespread dissemination of such consciousness, the only way Anglos could salvage their identity and honor was by going the extra mile in condemning Germanism, disavowing ‘racism’, promoting interracism, groveling at the feet of Jews(and denouncing any group or nation hated by Jews, be they Palestinians or Iran), cucking to blacks, celebrating GloboHomo sodomy(the favored pet project of Jews), idealizing degeneracy(akin to the Weimar Era), welcoming Diversity(as a means by Jews to play divide-and-rule among goyim), and etc.
Even now, Anglos in the UK and US hope that they may be spared the Jewish accusations of ‘racism’, ‘white supremacism’, and ‘Antisemitism’ by complying with every letter of the Jewish Agenda, but they will only destroy their domains by prescribing willfully destructive and degenerative policies. Then, is it any surprise that not only Germany but the UK, US, and all of the Anglosphere are doomed in the same manner?
While the military, economic, and political effects of German and Continental European affairs were limited or indirect on the US, the moral and ‘spiritual’ impact was far-reaching because ideas, unlike money and weapons, may flow freely, especially if those ideas are favored by the media and academia. It was only a matter of time before Jews spun the German Guilt into a poison formula that would include Anglo Guilt as well.
In this sense, the US role in the destruction of Germany, along with the creation of Israel, was one of the sick mothers of Jewish Domination and Northern European guilt-and-shame. Then, it’s hardly surprising that the Northern European stock, once the most powerful and prosperous in the world in both Europe and across the Americas, became the most pathetic and pissant, cucked and cooked, wussy and wimpy. Minnesota was like a Northern European paradise before the cucked mindset led the Scandie-Americans there to import the worst black trash from not only the American South but from Africa itself. Some of the ‘bluest’ areas in New England are high-status white communities that welcome policies that doom the white race. In Europe, the UK, Sweden, and Germany, once among the most respected nations, are now the biggest jokes. The ‘conservatives’ in the British Parliament now stand behind some oogity-boogity black biatch as the face of the Tory party. Tories or Whories? History is like a chess game. If you can’t see many moves ahead, the seemingly killer move can kill you down the line.
